Legal Opinion
Hartley v. Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided September 30, 2013No. Civil No. 11-2664 (JRT/JJG)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JOHN R. TUNHEIM, District Judge.
This case arises out of a $13.92 payment that Hartley allegedly owed to Suburban Radiologic Consultants, Ltd. (“Suburban”), a physician-owned radiology practice in the Twin Cities. Suburban retained CT Inc. Services1 (“Colltech”) to provide debt collection services on Suburban’s overdue accounts. In an attempt to collect Hartley’s overdue account, Colltech sent Hartley at least one collection letter. Hartley brings the current action, alleging multiple violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Laura Powers v. Credit Management Services, InCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Michelle Echlin v. PeacehealthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Nelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2017
- Carlvin v. Ditech Financial LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- GMS Mine Repair and Maintenance v. Jeffrey S. MilkosWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2017
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.