Legal Opinion

Wolf Investments, Inc. v. Town of Brookfield

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 11, 1987No. 86-337PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion

About nineteen months after the plaintiffs learned that the defendant town had voted at the 1983 annual town meeting to classify the road upon which their property abutted as a Class VI road subject to gates and bars, they filed suit for damages caused by the loss of town-maintained access to their property and, alternatively, for an order that the town maintain the road. The Superior Court (Wyman, J.) granted summary judgment for the defendant on the grounds that RSA 231:48 and 231:49 imposed a six-month statute of limitations on the plaintiffs’ suit and that the statutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raymond v. Eli Lilly & Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1977
  2. Lakeman v. LaFranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1959
  3. French v. R. S. Audley, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  4. Torr v. DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. University System of New Hampshire v. United States Gypsum Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1991
  3. Donnelly v. EastmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Fothergill v. Seabreeze Condominiums at Hampton Ass'nSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API