Legal Opinion

Williamson v. . Spivey

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 10, 1944PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The motion of the plaintiff to remand to the clerk perhaps would have been allowed, but for the order entered at the Becember Term, 1942, finding the report of the referees to be in compliance with their appointment, “to determine the matters at issue,” and this finding was made without objection on the part of the plaintiff. It is recited in the report that the cause was referred to the referees “for the purpose of finding the true dividing line between the lands of the plaintiff . . . and the lands of the defendant.” McIntosh on Procedure, 563. True, the plaintiff avers the reference was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. Thompson v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Anderson v. . McRaeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Sherwood v. SherwoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Jackson v. BobbittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Dellinger v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Kirkpatrick v. CurrieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Henderson County v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API