Legal Opinion

Henderson County v. Johnson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 12, 1949PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The question for decision is the sufficiency of the-record to support the judgment. There are no exceptions to any of the findings of fact. Hence, only the face of the record is presented for inspection and review. In re Collins, 226 N.C. 412, 38 S.E. 2d 160; Wilson v. Robinson, 224 N.C. 851, 32 S.E. 2d 601; Vestal v. Vending Machine Co., 219 N.C. 468, 14 S.E. 2d 427; Brown v. Truck Lines, 227 N.C. 65, 40 S.E. 2d 476; Harney v. Comrs. of McFarlan, 229 N.C. 71, 47 S.E. 2d 535; Rhodes v. Asheville, 229 N.C. 355, 49 S.E. 2d 638; Parker v. University, ante, 656.

In addition to the facts found by…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Everett v. . NewtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Vestal v. Moseley Vending MacHine Exchange, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. Graham v. FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Henderson County v. OsteenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Lovett v. StoneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Bailey v. McPhersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Culbreth v. Britt Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  5. Dellinger v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API