Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 16, 1941No. 5 Div. 328PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The widow and some of the heirs of W. F. Johnson, Sr., file this bill to have a tax sale of the land declared to have been caused by him to one of his sons, W. F, Johnson, Jr., with the intent to defraud the widow, then his wife, in respect to a claim then made by her for alimony in a pending suit, as well as a fraud upon the other children as his heirs at law, and do have the land sold for division as belonging to all his heirs, including the widow’s dower right.

The only question here involved is whether the bill is barred by limitations or laches as shown on its face.

Insofar…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Shell v. DuncanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1889
  2. Sherrill v. SandlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. Dearman v. RadcliffeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1843
  4. Stamey v. FortnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mudd v. LanierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  2. Reese v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Rioprop Holdings, LLC v. Compass BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2018
  4. In re WashingtonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  5. In re: Howard Ross v. Deborah Whitfield, as personal representative of the Estate of Gary T. WhitfieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API