Legal Opinion

Stamey v. Fortner

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1936No. 7 Div. 396PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.

On former appeal the decree sustaining demurrers to the bill, as theretofore amended, was affirmed. Stamey et al. v. Fortner et al., 230 Ala. 204, 160 So. 116.

Thereafter an amended bill was filed, designed to meet certain defects pointed out on the former appeal.

The present appeal is from a decree sustaining demurrers to the bill as last amended.

Dealing with the equity of this bill, in its several alternatives, we observe:

In substance, the amended bill avers that W. H. Fortner, an old man, whose estate ■consisted chiefly of lands, was sued in an action for damage in the sum…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stamey v. FortnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henslee v. HensleeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  2. Johnson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
  3. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API