Legal Opinion

Sherrill v. Sandlin

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 21, 1936No. 8 Div. 705PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The error assigned is the giving of the general affirmative charge requested in writing by the plaintiff.

The complaint as amended was for statutory ejectment of the whole interest in and possession of the lands as described in the last amendment.

Appellee’s only claim of title was by virtue of two tax sales, viz., on May 25, 1925, and June 16, 1924, at which Randolph Sandlin was the purchaser and which land he thereafter conveyed to appellee. -

The suit was begun on February 16, 1935, more than ten years from the date of purchase.

Defendants pleaded the general issue and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Winsett v. WinsettSupreme Court of Alabama · 1919
  2. Grayson v. MuckleroySupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Gilb v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Donnor v. QuartermasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  5. Burdett v. RossiterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Markstein v. SchilleciSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Reese v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Penny v. PennySupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
  4. Coppett v. MonahanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  5. Johnson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API