Dearman v. Radcliffe
Supreme Court of Alabama
Whit of Error to the Circuit Court of Sumter. This was an action of trover, at the suit of the defendant in error against the plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtCollier, C. J.
The only question of law arising in this case, is presented by a bill of exceptions, the facts recited in which are almost identical with those of Dearman v. Dearman, at the last term. So far as it is necessary to notice them, they may be thus condensed. In the year 1830, Jonathan Dearman, then a citizen of Florida, was desirous of removing to Alabama, with his family, but apprehensive if he did so, with certain slaves as ostensibly his property, they would be subjected to the payment of some debts, which he had been owing in Mississippi, for a long time. To prevent such a result, his son…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Springer v. DroschIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
- Davy v. KelleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Bolling v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Roden v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
- Johnson v. StephensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.