Carpenter v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
At the close of plaintiff’s evidence, defendant’s motion for a nonsuit was granted, and from the judgment entered .thereon plaintiffs have appealed.
Plaintiffs are heirs of C. M. Carpenter, deceased, who died from injuries alleged to have been sustained as a result of defendant’s negligent operation of a railway passenger train which collided with an automobile in which deceased was at the time traveling as a passenger.
It appears that Oak Street, in the city of Bakersfield, extends north and south, crossing at right angles the railway tracks of defendant, which at the time in question was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Little v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baltimore & Potomac R. Co. v. LandriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Crabbe v. Mammoth Channel Gold Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Fox v. Oakland Consolidated Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
- Bresee v. Los Angeles Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smellie v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1931
- Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Switzler v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Shields v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Thrasher v. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.