Sorin Equipment Co. v. Firm, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Connor, Judge:
Sorin Equipment designs and manufactures custom exercise equipment. The Firm operates exercise studios and sells exercise videos and equipment. Sorin appeals the trial judge’s grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict on one cause of action, and his grant of a new trial on damages on another cause of action. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
I. FACTS
In September 1991, Liz Guarnieri, a representative of The Firm, asked Richard Sorin, the owner of Sorin Equipment, to produce a customized exercise bar to be used in a forthcoming aerobic videotape. She explained she…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- O'Neal v. BowlesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Burwell v. South Carolina National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
- King v. OxfordCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Winburn v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
- Save Charleston Foundation v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thomas v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- In Re Bayerische Motoren Werke, AGTexas Supreme Court · 2000
- Kiriakides v. Atlas Food Systems & Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
- Norton v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
- Robertson v. First Union National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.