Legal Opinion

Lloyd v. Town of Chapel Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 1997No. COA95-1440PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHN, Judge.

Intervenors appeal the trial court’s order directing respondent the Town of Chapel Hill Board of Adjustment (the Board) “to approve, grant and issue” petitioner Thelma Lloyd’s (Lloyd) request for ten variances from the Resource Conservation District (RCD) provisions of respondent the Town of Chapel Hill’s (the Town) Development Ordinance (the Ordinance). Lloyd challenges inter-venors’ standing to intervene by cross-appeal. We hold intervenors were not aggrieved parties entitled to intervene in the proceedings at issue and consequently vacate that portion of the trial court’s order…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Heery v. Town of Highlands Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Culton v. CultonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  3. In Re Estate of TucciCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Allen v. City of Burlington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Davis v. City of ArchdaleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sarda v. City/County of Durham Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  2. Cherry v. WiesnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. Cook v. Union Zoning Bd. of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Smith v. Forsyth County Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Casper v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API