Allen v. City of Burlington Board of Adjustment
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Petitioner initially assigns error to the court’s ruling that he was required to prevail on the preliminary issues of standing and timeliness by a vote of four-fifths of the members of the Board. Due to our disposition of this appeal, we need not reach or decide this issue.
Petitioner next assigns error to the trial court’s decision upholding the Board of Adjustment’s holdings that he is not an aggrieved party, that his appeal is time-barred, and affirming the building inspector’s interpretation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
The scope of review for decisions made by a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cieszko v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Town & Country Civic Organization v. Winston-Salem Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
- Concerned Citizens of Downtown Asheville v. Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
3Cited by15 opinions
- MMR HOLDINGS, LLC v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Bailey & Associates, Inc. v. Wilmington Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Four Seasons Management Services, Inc. v. Town of Wrightsville BeachCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Lloyd v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
- Save Our Schools of Bladen County, Inc. v. Bladen County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.