Davis v. City of Archdale
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Preliminarily, we note that plaintiffs did not file their brief until twenty-five days after the printed record on appeal was mailed, well over the twenty days allowed by Rule 13(a) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure for filing an appellant’s brief. Neither did plaintiffs timely seek an extension of time to file their brief. For their failure to file a brief in a timely fashion, their appeal is subject to dismissal. Rule 13(c) of the Rules of Appellate Procedure. Nevertheless, in the exercise of our discretion, we consider the merits of the appeal.
The question before us is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Heery v. Town of Highlands Zoning Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
3Cited by10 opinions
- County of Lancaster v. Mecklenburg CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Village Creek Property Owners' Ass'n v. Town of EdentonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Cherry v. WiesnerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- Town of Ayden v. Town of WintervilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Lloyd v. Town of Chapel HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.