PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C. v. United States International Trade Commission
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALLACH, Judge.
INTRODUCTION
I
This matter comes before the court following its remand to Defendants United States International Trade Commission (the “Commission”) and United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”), respectively. In the underlying action, the court held that the support requirement of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000 (the “CDSOA” or the “Byrd Amendment”) was unconstitutional and severed that requirement from the statute. The court remanded to the Commission and Customs to determine Plaintiff PS Chez Sidney, L.L.C.’s (“Chez Sidney”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Heckler v. RingerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Cheney v. United States District Court for District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sioux Honey Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2010