Legal Opinion
Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 16, 1991No. Civ. 90-1060LPublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
This action involves a dispute between two companies as to their respective liability for clean-up costs for hazardous substances that were deposited at a manufacturing facility in Elmira, New York. Both companies, or their predecessors, had some connection with the premises. There were two agreements, however, with indemnification provisions, that must be interpreted to determine whether and under what circumstances liability may be shifted from one party to another.
Plaintiff, Purolator Products Corp. (“Purolator”), brought this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Mardan Corporation v. C.G.C. Music, Ltd. And MacMillan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Smith Land & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- United States v. a & F Materials Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 1984
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Horsehead Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Keywell Corporation v. Daniel C. Weinstein and Anthony BoscarinoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Beazer East, Inc. v. The Mead CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Smithkline Beecham Corporation v. Rohm and Haas Company v. Buckeye Pipe Line Company, Rohm and Haas CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.