Legal Opinion
Mobay Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 2, 1991No. Civ. A. 89-4268PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CORRECTED SUPERCEDING OPINION
WOLIN, District Judge.
This case requires resolution of complex issues regarding the scope of liability under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. (CERCLA). “The meager. legislative history available [for CERCLA] indicates that Congress expected the courts to develop a federal common law to supplement the statute.” Smith Land, & Improvement Corp. v. Celotex Corp., 851 F.2d 86, 89 (3d Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1029, 109 S.Ct. 837, 102 L.Ed.2d 969 (1989). The issues presented in this case…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Williams v. Borough of West ChesterCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Polaroid Corp. v. Rollins Environmental Services (NJ), Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- The John S. Boyd Company, Inc. v. Boston Gas Company, New England Electric SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Beazer East, Inc. v. The Mead CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Bowen Engineering v. Estate of ReeveDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Purolator Products Corp. v. Allied-Signal, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1991
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.