Legal Opinion
Kentucky Title Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. Dunavan
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided December 2, 1924PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*802Opinion op the Court by
Judge McCandless
Affirming.
Dunavan owned two small houses and lots in the city of Louisville. Aside from taxes these were free from encumbrance. Arnold owned a farm in Bullitt county which was encumbered by mortgage lien to the extent of $1,600.00, due to the Louisville Title Company. He had listed this farm for sale with Etheridge, a real estate dealer. Etheridge negotiated a deal with Dunavan for the exchange of these properties. The parties mutually executed a. writing in the nature of a title bond, by the terms of whch Arnold exchanged the farm for the two houses and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Dispatch Printing Co. v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1910
- Crahe v. Mercantile Trust & Savings BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Mitchell v. First National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. First National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Citizens & Peoples National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lindsley v. First National BankSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Blake v. Woodford Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1977
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Bear Butte Valley BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Schweitzer v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Modern Homes Construction Co. v. Tryon Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.