Legal Opinion
United States v. Adislado Parades Rosales
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 30, 1990No. 90-10068PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Chief Judge:
Adislado Rosales appeals his sentence upon his guilty plea to misprision of a felony (distribution of heroin) in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 4. He contends that the district court erred in not reducing his base offense level for acceptance of responsibility and in considering the total amount of heroin involved in the underlying felony in setting his base offense level. We affirm the sentence.
DEA agent Pete Ramirez made arrangements with codefendant Enrique Mendez Pineda (Mendez) to purchase ten ounces of heroin for $22,000. Ramirez and Mendez agreed to conduct the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Roberto GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Michael Xavier RigbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leonis Smith, United States of America v. Karen Lynn WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Leo KleinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- United States v. Kayle NordbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. ReeseCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard AicheleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Jearold Kenneth Williams, United States of America v. George AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Muhannad MusaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.