Legal Opinion

United States v. Kayle Nordby

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 11, 2000No. 99-10191PublishedCited by 354 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.

CANBY, Circuit Judge:

In this case we are called upon to apply the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Apprendi held that a fact that increases the prescribed statutory maximum penalty to which a criminal defendant is exposed must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 2362-63: We hold that the amount of drugs for which a defendant is sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) is such a fact, and that our existing precedent to the contrary is…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by354 opinions

  1. United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. Ramse ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  5. People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API