United States v. Kayle Nordby
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge REINHARDT.
CANBY, Circuit Judge:
In this case we are called upon to apply the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Apprendi v. New Jersey, — U.S. -, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). Apprendi held that a fact that increases the prescribed statutory maximum penalty to which a criminal defendant is exposed must be submitted to a jury and proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. at 2362-63: We hold that the amount of drugs for which a defendant is sentenced under 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1) is such a fact, and that our existing precedent to the contrary is…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by354 opinions
- United States v. DuarteCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Calvin Wayne BucklandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Pacheco-ZepedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Ramse ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- People v. AbilezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
349 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.