Legal Opinion

Hobbs v. Hobbs

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 7, 1940PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pee. Cueiam.

In the action instituted by Samuel H. Hobbs, he moves to dismiss the appeal for that the record contains no assignment of error. The motion is allowed. Bule 19, sec. 3, of the Eules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 200 N. C., 824.

The judgment in the first action, having absolutely divorced the plaintiff and defendant, all rights arising out of the marriage cease, C. S., 1663, including the right to alimony under C. S., 1667. Duffy v. Duffy, 120 N. C., 346, 27 S. E., 28. Hence, motion of appellee therein that the appeal be dismissed will be treated as motion to affirm, and as such…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Duffy v. . DuffySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. Rayfield v. RayfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  4. Jenkins v. . JenkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Livingston v. LivingstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API