Estate of Vance
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Fresno County settling the final account of an administratrix. H. Z. Austin, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, J.—
This is an appeal from the order settling the final account of Clara M. Vance, administratrix of the estate of Samuel L. Vance, deceased.
The final account of the estate of Samuel L. Vance, deceased, as filed in the court below, showed that the administratrix had received no assets belonging to the estate, and had expended something over one thousand dollars on account of the estate. At the time of the hearing, Bertha A. Smith, as administratrix of the estate of Eliza M. Vance, deceased, filed exceptions to the final account, claiming that the estate of Eliza M. Vance was interested…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. WesterfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Ex parte CaseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- In re Estate of HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Griffin & Skelly Co. v. Magnolia & Healdsburg Fruit Cannery Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Curtis v. SchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Estate of YoellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Neel v. BarnardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- In re Estate of DaltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1918
- Shiels v. NathanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.