Curtis v. Schell
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a motion to vacate the judgment for the plaintiff and to enter a judgment for the defendants. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, J.
This is a proceeding in equity to set aside an order granting a family allowance in the matter of the estate of Theodore L. Schell, deceased, and an order authorizing the sale of the real property of said estate for the purpose of paying said family allowance, and for general relief.
From the facts found the court, as a conclusion of law, held that the mortgages given to secure the indebtedness held by ■the plaintiff were a lien upon the interest of the defendant Georgiana L. Schell in and to the real estate of the estate of said Theodore L. Schell, and that said interest of defendant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Marine Ins. Co. of Alexandria v. HodgsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Arrowsmith v. GleasonSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Wickersham v. ComerfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Jorgensen v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Campbell-Kawannanakoa v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- Estate of GlassfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- In Re the Guardianship of the Person & Estate of BundyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.