Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. Burke

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1929PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

This is an action to recover from defendants $1,200, 'which plaintiff paid them in advance in payment of the last six months’ rent, less $585, rent due at the time of the termination of the lease.

The cause was tried to the court without the intervention of a jury. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff for $615, from which defendants appeal.

The parties entered into a written lease on October 17, 1924. At the time the plaintiff was occupying the garage premises under a lease which expired December 31,1925. The term of the new lease was from January 1, 1926, to December 31,1930, for the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Evans v. McClureSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  4. Cunningham v. StockonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Sherman, Clay & Co. v. Buffum & PendletonOregon Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dearborn Stove Co. v. CaplesTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Hughes v. BembryOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. State Highway Commission v. DemarestOregon Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Abrahamson v. BrettOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Redmon v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API