Perk v. City of Euclid
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPaul M. Herbert, J.
(Retired. Assigned to active duty under authority of Section 6(C), Article IV, Constitution.) The city of Euclid bases its application upon the provisions of Section 2 of Amended Senate Bill No. 351 (1967). Section 2 was of temporary effect, having been enacted by the General Assembly on August 14, 1967, and made effective from November 24, 1967, through December 31, 1968, and therefore was not codified. Section 1 of Amended Senate Bill No. 351, which is not involved here, enacted new Section 5713.081, Revised Code.
The city of Euclid sought exemption from and remission of taxes upon the real…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Struble v. DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Hostetter v. HuntOhio Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Crotty v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by8 opinions
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
- Patricia L. Pratt, Cross-Appellant v. National Distillers & Chemical Corporation, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
- Smith v. Ohio Valley Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1971
- Osai v. A & D Furniture Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1981
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Supreme Court · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.