Legal Opinion

Moore v. Grandview Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1986No. 85-1633PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

In this case we are asked to determine the propriety of the expert testimony given by Daniel Moore’s treating physician, Lauren Vogel, D.O.

The admissibility of such testimony is governed by the statutory physician-patient privilege, R.C. 2317.02(B). R.C. 2317.02 states in pertinent part:

“The following persons shall not testify in certain respects:
“(B) A physician concerning a communication made to him by his patient in that relation or his advice to his patient but the physician may testify by express consent of the patient * * * or if the patient, his executor or administrator, files a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Baker v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  2. In Re RobertoOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  3. Vincenzo v. NewhartOhio Court of Appeals · 1966
  4. State ex rel. Holman v. Dayton Press, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Huzjak v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1987
  3. Berlinger v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Long v. IsakovOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Hollis v. FingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API