Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Holman v. Dayton Press, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 29, 1984No. 83-557PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Per curiam
R.C. 2317.02 states:
“The following persons shall not testify in certain respects:
* *
“(B) A physician concerning a communication made to him by his patient in that relation or his advice to his patient but the physician may testify by express consent of the patient * * * or if the patient voluntarily testifies the physician may be compelled to testify on the same subject * * *.”
Appellants concede that appellee’s medical records are privileged pursuant to R.C. 2317.02(B). They nevertheless argue that the commission had authority for the actions and the order which are the focus of this…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Floyd v. Court of Common PleasOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1938
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Rouch v. Eagle Tool & Machine Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1986
- Moore v. Grandview HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- Hollis v. FingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Talvan v. SiegelOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- In re Estate of WallaceOhio Court of Appeals · 1990