In Re Roberto
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HURD, J:
The petitioner, Dr. Daniel P. Roberto, a practicing physician in the City of Cleveland, has invoked the original jurisdiction of this court for the purpose oí obtaining a writ of Habeas Corpus to release him from technical arrest on a mittimus issued for contempt of a notary public because of his refusal to answer certain questions propounded to him during the course of a hearing by way of deposition in two cases now pending in the Court of Common Pleas of Cuyahoga County. The principal case is a suit by Katherine Nykowski for personal injures alleged to have been sustained…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Weis v. WeisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Spitzer v. StillingsOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Munzer v. Swedish American LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1940
- Clifford v. Denver & Rio Grande RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- In Re LoewenthalOhio Court of Appeals · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Patania v. SilverstoneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- State v. DressOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. KavlichOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
- Covington v. SawyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.