Legal Opinion

Huzjak v. United States

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided December 17, 1987No. C86-2749YPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL AUTHORIZATION

KRENZLER, District Judge.

Pending before the court is a motion by defendant United States of America to compel plaintiff Marjorie M. Huzjak (“Huzjak”) to “execute an authorization permitting Cleveland Clinic Foundation personnel to fully discuss with defendant her medical condition and her medical treatment while a patient at the Clinic in 1983.” In effect, defendant asks the Court to compel Huzjak to waive her physician/patient privilege with respect to doctors who treated the plaintiff at The Cleveland…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Doe v. Eli Lilly & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Lambdin v. BrentonOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Mariner v. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1962
  5. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States v. David WeisigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1829

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Med. Mut. of Ohio v. SchlottererOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Ward v. Summa Health SystemOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Medical Board v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Tucker v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2001
  5. Garrett v. Jeep Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API