Legal Opinion

Radabaugh v. Just

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 1947No. 34,477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Action to enjoin defendant from engaging in the practice of medicine in Hastings and vicinity in violation of a written agreement between plaintiff and defendant. The trial court made findings of fact, conclusions of law, and order for judgment in favor of plaintiff. Thereafter defendant moved for amended findings or a new trial. The motion was denied, and this appeal by defendant followed.

No appeal lies from that part of the order denying the motion for amended findings. Insofar as the motion for a new trial is concerned, it appears that no grounds were specified therefor. Hence there is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. Kittson County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Julius v. LenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  3. Clark v. C. N. Nelson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
  4. In Re Estate of WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  5. Spencer v. StanleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. Kiebach v. KiebachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Nelson v. the Swedish HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  4. State v. DailsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API