Legal Opinion

Gryskiewicz v. Morgan

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1960PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

In January, 1950, the plaintiff instituted this action in negligence to recover for property damage to his automobile resulting from a collision with an automobile operated by the defendant. The judgment file discloses that it was not until about eight years later that issue was joined on the allegations of the complaint. A counterclaim was then filed, and issue was joined on its allegations about six weeks later. Thereafter, the action was specially assigned for trial on May 14, 1958, which was nearly two months after the pleadings had been closed. Neither party appeared on the trial date,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Automotive Twins, Inc. v. KleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  2. Stanley v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  3. Bassett v. FosterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1932
  4. White's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  2. Lashgari v. LashgariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Testa v. Carrolls Hamburger System, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. Grondin v. CuriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Morelli v. Manpower, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API