Legal Opinion

H. Reeve Angel & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 27, 1944No. C. D. 906Published

1Opinion of the Court

Kincheloe, Judge:

This suit is for the recovery of certain customs duty alleged to have been improperly assessed on certain imported merchandise. The merchandise is invoiced as “Whatman” filter paper. It was returned by the examiner as “Filtering paper circles,” and was classified for duty by the collector as “paper cut or stamped into designs or shapes, etc.,” at 30 per centum ad valorem under that portion of paragraph 1413 of the Tariff Act of 1930, reading:

• Par. 1413. Papers and paper board and pulpboard, including cardboard and leatherboard or compress leather, embossed, cut, die-cut, or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Snow's United States Sample Express Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1918
  2. Drakenfeld & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1919
  3. United States v. A. W. Faber, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1929
  4. Bache & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1922
  5. Kupfer Bros. Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API