Legal Opinion

Zehring v. Driskel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 16, 1959No. 41,242PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Wertz, J.:

Plaintiff (appellant) brought this action, as payee of a promissory note, against defendants (appellees), the makers thereof, to recover money allegedly due under the note and contract made a part of the petition. From an order sustaining defendants’ demurrer to the petition as amended, plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff, J. C. Zehring, alleged that on December 16, 1949, defendants, Cletus and Hazel A. Driskel, executed and delivered to him a promissory note in the sum of $12,000; that consideration for the note was $6,000 in cash advanced by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Vander Realty Co. Inc. v. GabrielMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1956
  2. Morris Shoe Co. v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  3. Wood v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
  4. State Ex Rel. Fatzer v. Sinclair Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Diehr v. Thompson Chemicals Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniel v. LebenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API