Legal Opinion

Morris Shoe Co. v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 4, 1920PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Hurt

Affirming.

'■ The appellee, Coleman as plaintiff below, instituted ibis action against the appellant, Morris Shoe Company, to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract between them, whereby the defendant had employed the plaintiff to work for it as a salesman in its store at Padncah. Upon a trial by jury, a verdict was returned for the plaintiff and a judgment rendered in accordance therewith. The defendant’s motion for a new trial having been overruled, it has appealed.

Tlie terms of the contract relied upon by the plaintiff are embraced by a letter,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Corporation for the Relief of Poor Distressed Presbyterian v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  2. Smith v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. John C. Lewis Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1894
  4. Raleigh v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Sousely v. Burns's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rudd-Melikian, Inc. v. Henry T. Merritt, Doing Business as Coffee Service Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1960
  2. Billetter v. PosellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  3. Putnam v. Producers' Live Stock Marketing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1934
  4. Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. ZeiglerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. Hansen v. Columbia Breweries, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API