Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & N. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, District Judge.
The complainant, the Central Stock Yards Company, has very recently established a large and expensive *824plant for the conduct of its business.. It is located on the line of the Southern Railway Company, just outside of the limits of the. city of Louisville. Some 12 or more years ago the Louisville •& Nashville Railroad Company, having no adequate depot facilities for handling live freight, entered into a contract with the Bourbon Stock Yards Company (the plant of which was located within the city limits), under which that stock yards company was to erect,, and it did erect…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Farmers' & Mechanics' National Bank v. DearingSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wisconsin, Minnesota & Pacific Railroad v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Barnet v. National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Toledo, A. A. & N. M. Ry. Co. v. Pennsylvania Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio · 1893
- Covington Stock-Yards Co. v. KeithSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Oscar Ewing, Inc. v. MeltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
- United States Nav. Co. v. Cunard S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- United States v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1905
- Swofford v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Smeltzer v. St. Louis & S. F. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Arkansas · 1909
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.