Legal Opinion

Double AA Builders, Ltd. v. Grand State Construction L.L.C.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 28, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 03-0609PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Grand State Construction L.L.C., a subcontractor, appeals a judgment awarding damages to Double AA Builders, Ltd., a general contractor, on a promissory estoppel claim. Double AA cross-appeals the trial court’s denial of attorneys’ fees under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 12-341.01(A) (2003). We affirm the judgment in favor of the general contractor because the evidence is sufficient to support the trial court’s implied findings of each element of promissory estoppel. We also conclude that § 12-341.01(A) is not applicable to a promise made enforceable…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Frances M. Bonebrake, Administratrix De Bonis Non of the Estate of Woodrow B. Simek, Deceased v. Donald Cox and Claude Cox, D/B/A Tamarack BowlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1974
  2. Drennan v. Star Paving Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Barmat v. John and Jane Doe Partners ADArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jerome Jablon, M.D. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. Pavel Enterprises, Inc. v. AS Johnson Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Douglas E. Barnhart, Inc. v. CMC Fabricators, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Grubb & Ellis Management Services, Inc. v. 407417 B.C., L.L.C.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Sholes v. FernandoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Gorman v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API