Legal Opinion
Scott v. Carr
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided August 26, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00236Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 AT SEATTLE 10 11 PAUL SCOTT, CASE NO. C20-236RSM 12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO COMPEL 13 AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 14 CALEB CARR, et al., 15 16 Defendants. 17 18 I. INTRODUCTION 19 This matter comes before the Court on Defendants Caleb Carr and Vita Inclinata 20 Technologies, Inc. (“Vita”)’s Motion to Compel, Dkt. #53, and Motion for Protective Order and 21 22 Order Quashing Plaintiff’s Notice of Deposition, Dkt. #55. Plaintiff Paul Scott has also filed a 23 Motion to Compel. Dkt.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Surfvivor Media, Inc. Peter S. Deptula v. Survivor Productions CBS Broadcasting Inc. CBS Worldwide, Inc. Wpc Brands, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- In Re Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Or.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Young v. YoungWashington Supreme Court · 2008
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.