Legal Opinion

Constant Velocity Corp. v. City of Aurora

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 9, 1995No. 93C 11197; CA A83308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this writ of review action, plaintiff appeals a circuit court judgment holding that the City of Aurora had erred in assessing plaintiff $14,307.70 for costs of abatement of a nuisance, and that the assessment should have been $4,163.50. The city cross-appeals,1 assigning error to the trial court’s reduction in the assessment. We affirm on appeal and on cross-appeal.

The facts relevant to this appeal are that plaintiff owned a building that was located within the historic district of the city of Aurora. In July 1990 there was a major fire in the building, which left only the exterior…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Braidwood v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  2. Caffey v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Home Builders Ass'n of Metropolitan Portland v. City of West LinnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. W. Hills Dev. Co. v. DoughmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. Hansen v. Board of CommissionersBenton County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API