Legal Opinion

Caffey v. Lane County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 25, 1985No. 16-81-08893; CA A23661PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Plaintiff appeals a circuit court order, issued on a writ of review, which affirmed the decision of a Lane County hearings officer involving plaintiffs two dogs, Ginger and Mo, who allegedly had attacked a sheep in violation of a Lane County ordinance. We affirm.

On September 14, 1981, at about 5:00 a.m., Mrs. Belisle found two dogs attacking her ewe in her barn. Subsequently, plaintiffs dogs were impounded for violation of Lane Code § 5.255(1):

“Any dog which chases, kills, wounds or injures livestock not belonging to its owner while off the premises owned or under the control of its owner may…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Menges v. Board of County CommissionersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Caffey v. Lane CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Caffey v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Blakely v. Industrial IndemnityCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Caffey v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shakerin v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  2. Johnson v. Civil Service BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Crainic v. Multnomah County Adult Care Home ProgramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  4. Baker v. City of WoodburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Constant Velocity Corp. v. City of AuroraCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API