Legal Opinion

Home Builders Ass'n of Metropolitan Portland v. City of West Linn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 15, 2006No. CCV0207049; A123168PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.

Petitioners in this writ of review action are developers and a developers’ association. They initiated this action after respondent, the City of West Linn, adopted a resolution that increased the system development charge (SDC) that the city imposes on new development to pay for parks and recreation facilities. Petitioners asserted, among other things, that the SDC does not conform to statutory and other legal requirements and is not supported by substantial evidence. The trial court ultimately rejected petitioners’ challenges. On appeal, petitioners renew a number of their challenges in six…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. WebbOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Carlson v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Homebuilders Ass'n v. Tualatin Hills Park & Recreation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  5. Alt v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bullock v. City of AshlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Hansen v. Board of CommissionersBenton County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API