Legal Opinion

Newland v. Kizer

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 11, 1989No. D007649PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KREMER, P. J.

Plaintiffs John Newland et al. appeal judgment dismissing on the ground of no justiciable controversy their action for injunction, declaratory relief and mandate against defendants State of California Department of Health Services (Department) and its director Kenneth Kizer (together the State defendants). We affirm with respect to plaintiffs’ claims involving Health and Safety Code 1 section 1336. With respect to plaintiffs’ claims involving section 1335, we reverse with directions to the superior court.

I

On September 3, 1986, plaintiffs filed a class action complaint…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Green v. ObledoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  5. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Environmental Defense Project v. County of SierraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Connerly v. SchwarzeneggerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  4. Botello v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Davis v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API