Mundon v. Taxicab Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
The appellant, defendant below, appeals from a decree enjoining him from operating taxicabs owned by him, in Baltimore City, without taking measures to distinguish them in appearance from those of the Taxicab Company, now named the Yellow Cab Company, the appellee. The evidence establishes these facts:
The Taxicab Company has been operating cabs in the city since 1909, and for the first ten years of that period had them painted in a uniform combination of colors, with brown predominating. They were then commonly known as brown cabs. In 1919, the uniform color combination was changed, and a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Holmes, Booth & Haydens v. Holmes, Booth & Atwood Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
- Shredded Wheat Co. v. Humphrey Cornell Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- Marvel Co. v. PearlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
- Yellow Cab Co. v. CreasmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Kusnetsky v. Security InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dixon v. Process Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- In Re Lexington Appliance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1962
- In Re NickulasDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954
- TIME, INCORPORATED v. Motor PublicationsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1955
- Burton v. Taxicab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.