Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Kenneth Beye

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 8, 1971No. 24418_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

Beye appeals from his conviction for knowingly concealing or facilitating the transportation of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 176a and for knowingly concealing or facilitating the transportation of illegally imported amphetamine tablets and barbiturate capsules in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545.

Appellant relies primarily upon the argument that he was the victim of an unlawful search and seizure. We find no merit in this contention. The discovery of the drugs occurred at an immigration checkpoint in the course of a lawful search for aliens. See, e. g., Fumagalli v. United States, 429…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daniel J. Bowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1970
  2. Frank Thomas Fumagalli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. United States v. Orange Jell BeechumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
  2. United States v. Patricia Campbell HearstCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. United States v. Herman Tyrone HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. DicksTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  5. United States v. Peter Licavoli, Sr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API