Legal Opinion

Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co.

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 6, 1945No. Nos. 194, 195PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

These actions involve common questions of law and similar issues of fact. By agreement of the parties, for the purpose of trial, they were consolidated and tried by the Court without the intervention of a jury.

During the period here involved the defendant Gatliff Coal Company, a Delaware corporation, was engaged in operating several coal mines in Whitley County, Kentucky, and in marketing a substantial amount of the coal in interstate commerce. The plaintiffs were employed by defendant in operating its power house which furnished the power for the operation of all the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hamilton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  2. United Shoe Workers of America v. Le Danne FootwearDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1949
  3. Sloan v. Warren Civil Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API