Piercy v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Turner, Commissioner—
Affirming.
This appeal involves the seniority rights of a conductor on the Louisville & Nashville Eailroad.
*479Appellee Stanfill was for many years prior to 1922 an employe of that company, and for fifteen years or more had operated as passenger conductor a fast daylight train running between Cincinnati, Ohio, and Knoxville, Tennessee, known as number 32-33.
The company operated between those points three regular passenger trains each way each day; the through fast daylight train (number 32-33) one each way, a local daylight train running each way (number…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hudson v. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific RailwayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Pennsylvania Co. v. Reager's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
3Cited by55 opinions
- Yazoo M.V.R. Co. v. SideboardMississippi Supreme Court · 1931
- National Labor Relations Board v. Union Pacific Stages, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Gatliff Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Rentschler v. Missouri Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
- System Federation No. 59 of Railway Employees Department of American Federation of Labor v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.