Legal Opinion
United Shoe Workers of America v. Le Danne Footwear
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 18, 1949No. Civil Action 8044PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
In this suit brought under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act 1947, 29 U.S.C.A. § 185, defendant moves to dismiss so much of plaintiff’s action as is based on an oral agreement alleged in paragraph Sixth of the amendment to the complaint, on the ground that said agreement is neither a collective bargaining agreement nor a valid contract, and hence the action based thereon is not one over which this court is given jurisdiction by Section 301.
In deciding this motion the relevant allegations of the plaintiff’s complaint must be taken as true. A written…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- H. J. Heinz Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gatliff Coal Co. v. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
- Gilman & Son, Inc. v. Turner Tanning Machinery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
- Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1945
3Cited by12 opinions
- Hamilton Foundry & MacHine Co. v. International Molders & Foundry Workers Union of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
- District 2, Marine Engineers Beneficial Ass'n v. Falcon Carriers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Ass'n of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union, Local 142 v. Libby, McNeill & LibbyDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1953
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.