Legal Opinion

Serway v. Galentine

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1946No. Civ. 15265PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilson, J.

The purpose of this action is to obtain a decree that plaintiff Karen June Serway, now three years of age, is the legitimate child of plaintiff Stanford S. Serway. Defendant, the mother of the child, contested the action but furnished the evidence that indubitably sustains the findings and judgment in favor of plaintiffs.

Defendant was married to one Thomas Galentine on May 2, 1939, and lived with him as his wife until July 6, 1942. She gave the following testimony: In March, 1942, plaintiff Stanford Serway began living at the Galentine home in Los Angeles and while residing there had sexual…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Berry v. ChaplinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  3. McNamara v. McNamaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Dionisio v. Dacanay and Reynaldo C. Dacanay, by His Father and Next Friend v. Saturnina Mendoza, Victor P. Mendoza, and Doe Insurance Co. No. 1Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  2. Sarracino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gonzales v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. In Re Richard M.California Supreme Court · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API