Legal Opinion

Sielcken-Schwarz v. American Factors, Ltd.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

Paul Isenberg, the plaintiff’s father, was an officer and large stockholder of H. Háckfeld & Co., Ltd., a corporation organized under the laws of Hawaii and which conducted there the business of sugar-factor agent, general merchandising and related enterprises. He was also an executive officer and owned a substantial stock interest in a number of corporations owning or maintaining sugar plantations, which were represented by H. Hackfeld & Co. as factor. Paul Isenberg died in 1903. Under his will his wife received one-third of the shares owned by him in these' corporations, and his eight…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schuylkill Fuel Corp. v. B. & C. Nieberg Realty Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Higgins v. . CrouseNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Isenberg v. ShermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Klotz v. . AngleNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Taft v. WrightNew York Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Koch v. Christie's International PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
  2. Klein v. BowerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970
  3. Abercrombie v. Andrew CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
  4. Smith v. KirkpatrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
  5. St. John's University, New York v. BoltonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API