Legal Opinion

Franke v. Franke

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 1, 1896No. 1,773PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.

The appellee sued to recover the amount due her for the year 1891, under the terms of an ante-*530nuptial contract, out of the estate of her deceased, husband. The complaint, which is in one paragraph, omitting the caption, reads as follows:

“Christena Franke, plaintiff, complaining of Charles C. Franke and Louisa Franke, defendants, says: That heretofore^ to-wit, on the 28th day of January, 1894, one Henry Franke was an unmarried man, a widower, and the plaintiff, Christena Franke, was an unmarried woman, a widow, and the said Henry and the said plaintiff were then desirous of intermarrying, and…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
  2. Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stuck v. Town of Beech GroveIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Linderman Machine Co. v. Hillenbrand Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
  3. Trook v. CrouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Snowhill v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API