Legal Opinion
Franke v. Franke
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 1, 1896No. 1,773PublishedCited by 4 opinions
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtRoss, J.
The appellee sued to recover the amount due her for the year 1891, under the terms of an ante-*530nuptial contract, out of the estate of her deceased, husband. The complaint, which is in one paragraph, omitting the caption, reads as follows:
“Christena Franke, plaintiff, complaining of Charles C. Franke and Louisa Franke, defendants, says: That heretofore^ to-wit, on the 28th day of January, 1894, one Henry Franke was an unmarried man, a widower, and the plaintiff, Christena Franke, was an unmarried woman, a widow, and the said Henry and the said plaintiff were then desirous of intermarrying, and…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Fischli v. FischliIndiana Supreme Court · 1825
- Crosby v. JerolomanIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Green v. GlynnIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Goble v. DillonIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Griffin v. WallaceIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Stuck v. Town of Beech GroveIndiana Supreme Court · 1928
- Linderman Machine Co. v. Hillenbrand Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1921
- Trook v. CrouchIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
- Snowhill v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1906