Legal Opinion

Snowhill v. Diamond Plate Glass Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 28, 1906No. 5,473Published

From Grant Superior Court; B. F. Harness, Judge. • Action by Jobn Snowhill against the Diamond Plate Glass Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Robixsox, J.-

1. Suit by appellant upon a natural gas lease to recover acreage rental. The rent sought to be recovered is for the years 1896, 1899, and 1900. The case is here on the second appeal. Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Snowhill (1900), 24 Ind. App. 700. That appeal was decided upon the authority of Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Curless (1899), 22 Ind. App. 346, and Diamond Plate Glass Co. v. Echelbarger (1900), 24 Ind. App. 124. There was a special finding of facts, and the appeal is governed by the case of Hancock v. Diamond Plate Glass Co. (1906), 37 Ind. App. 351, unless the following…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Russell v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Binkley v. ForknerIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Marshall v. John Grosse Clothing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Racke v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  5. Eckert v. BinkleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API