Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Leavitt

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1855PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Application to the court, by a special receiver, for instructions. The facts on which the application was based, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMitohell, P. J.

In December, 1842, John J. Palmer, after these two suits were instituted, was appointed special receiver to take and hold, under the direction of the court, certain property formerly of the North American Trust and Banking Company. The special receiver collected $1,100,000 and upwards, and deposited it in the New York Life Insurance and Trust Company, and still has a large amount of property not yet converted into money. After a long controversy, a decree was made in both causes, sustaining the claims of creditors under the trust instruments executed by the company, and directing the special…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Quackenbush v. LeonardNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  2. City Bank v. BangsNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Steinback v. DiepenbrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Corey v. LongThe Superior Court of New York City · 1872
  3. Grow v. GarlockNew York Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Le Brun v. SixtoDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API